Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Chronic Illness, Disability, and Toxic Positivity: Why It's Harmful

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I'm going to be doing another personal post. I haven't posted a personal post like this in almost four months and I've honestly missed doing posts like this.


I'm going to be talking about toxic positivity and why it's especially bad when it comes to disability and chronic illness.


Let's get into the post!

King, Alexandria. Musings of an Arthritic Artist. 2021.

I cannot count the amount of times I've seen "it could be worse" on the internet. This is something a lot of people will tell people with chronic illnesses, or just people going through things in general. This annoys me so much. 

These are examples of situations where toxic positivity may show up: when someone is chronically ill and having a bad day, when someone who has anxiety or depression is having a bad day, when someone is diagnosed with a chronic illness, when someone loses their job, along with many other situations.

Toxic positivity has also popped up a lot during the pandemic we're still in the middle of, and it's incredibly problematic. "It could be worse" has popped up on numerous occasions during the pandemic, and it's not helping. It's only succeeding in invalidating other people's emotions. The Washington Post had a very interesting article about this, which I linked at the end of this post.

Telling someone "it could be worse" is an innocuous sounding thing. This is usually said by someone whose heart is in the right place. However, this is problematic. The problem with this is that it invalidates how the person is feeling. By saying it could be worse, it feels as if the person's problems aren't that severe. It can contribute to trivializing someone's pain.

Typically, the way this is used with people who are chronically ill is that the person will say "It could be worse. At least you don't have cancer." And yes, while this may be true, it only helps to make someone feel as if they shouldn't be feeling the way they do. It makes them feel guilty about experiencing human emotions.

The problem is that always being positive, even when you're not, can be damaging to someone's emotional health. It can cause them to dismiss or deny any emotions that are 'negative.' 

It isn't a healthy way to live. If used correctly, no emotions are bad. It's impossible for human beings to be happy all the time, so it's impossible to ask people to be happy all the time. 

The downfall for this is that over time negative emotions will build up. Some people bottle their emotions. Some do it due to trauma, and others do it naturally and it's just something that's ingrained into their personality. I actually tend to bottle my emotions. I have since I was a child. There isn't really an explanation for why.

The problem with toxic positivity is that it forces that kind of behavior on someone. Scientists have proven that bottling emotions isn't healthy. What happens is that the more negative emotions pile up, the more someone will feel them when they can't hold it in anymore. It'll be repressed for so long that it'll break like a dam. 

Toxic positivity pushes a harmful narrative that humans can--and should be--positive all the time, even when they don't feel positive. That the bright side should always be seen. On its own, it seems harmless. But like I said, this will lead people to deny or dismiss their emotions.

Here's the thing: positivity is good--in moderation. While it is good to be positive and happy the majority of the time, it's definitely not good to overdue it to the point of invalidating or dismissing 'negative' emotions.

Humans cannot be positive and happy all the time, no matter how hard we try. Anger, sadness, disappointment, disgust, and fear are all natural human emotions as well, not just happiness. And when we force the narrative of 'you always have to be happy,' it's damaging to the relationship a person has with their emotions. 

People who engage in toxic positivity usually don't see it as toxic. The problem is that people who participate in toxic positivity will feel guilty for feeling natural emotions such as sadness and anger. They'll feel guilty because they aren't being positive and happy. 

There's a difference between being happy and peppy, and spreading toxic positivity. Some people have a naturally more positive, happy, and peppy reaction to things. Being an optimist is a good thing, but when it's pushed too hard, it can quickly turn into toxic positivity. It's damaging to someone's emotional wellbeing. 

________________________________________

When it comes to chronic illness or disability, toxic positivity isn't helpful. Chronic illness is exactly that: it's chronic, which means it's incurable and long-lasting. It's not something you can eliminate. Disability isn't either. Disability isn't a mask that can be taken off at the end of the day. It's always there. It's a life-long problem. To tell people with chronic illnesses and disabilities to always be positive, it's damaging.

If someone is recently diagnosed or is still coping with the thought of living with an incurable illness for the rest of their life, it's harmful to invalidate their feelings by using toxic positivity. I've lived with my autoimmune disease (autoimmune diseases are chronic, by the way) for almost 20 years now (about 17 years, 8 months), and sometimes, it still causes a flurry of emotions. 

Chronic illnesses and disabilities are difficult to cope with. They aren't easy things to talk about, nor are they easy to live with. These are problems that someone will have to deal with for the rest of their life. For those of us who were born with what we have, it's even longer. This is the life I've gotten used to. This is the only life I've known, and even I have bad days. 

It's okay to not be okay, as long as you are able to pick yourself back up. It may take forever, but you'll get there. Every emotion is temporary, which means even happiness is temporary. Emotions can come and go in an instant, and to force positivity down people's throats is the wrong approach to 'negative' emotions.

________________________________________

In my opinion, the Disney movie Inside Out did a perfect job of covering this topic. For those of you who don't know it: the main characters are the five emotions living inside Riley, a young girl's mind. The emotions are Joy, Sadness, Anger, Disgust, and Fear. 

The aspects of five most important "core memories" within Riley's personality form five floating islands. Joy is the leader, and she and the rest of the emotions try to limit the influence Sadness has. All the emotions drive Riley's reactions to things. These emotions will create memories, which are little colored orbs that will be stored in 'long-term memory.' 

Riley has recently moved with her family from Minnesota to San Francisco. This causes new emotions to surface. On her first day of a new school, Sadness accidentally turns an old joyous memory sad, which causes Riley to cry. This memory was a core memory. Joy tries to get rid of it by using a vacuum tube, but she accidentally knocks loose the rest of the core memories. 

Joy, Sadness, and the core memories are sucked out of the headquarters, leaving Disgust, Anger, and Fear to deal with Riley's emotions themselves. Sadness and Joy begin to search for the core memories and Joy tries to prevent Sadness from touching them, knowing she'll turn them sad. 

The movie ends beautifully, and this is a really good example of toxic positivity. It's fun, it's creative, and it talks about an important issue that a lot of times brings forth a lot of problems. 

________________________________________

In my opinion, toxic positivity should be eliminated. It doesn't tend to help anyone. It's harmful and damaging to people's emotional health. I'll leave some links below about the topic for anyone who is interested in reading more about it. Despite how annoying I find it, it's a very interesting topic.

The truth is that, as humans, we can't always pick and choose what emotions to feel. Emotions come naturally. Some people are more emotional and sensitive than others, and that's okay. 

Every human needs to feel every emotion and deal with them in a healthy way. It's okay to feel sadness. It's okay to feel anger. If they are utilized in a productive way, there's very little room for error.

That's it for this post! I hope you enjoyed it! 

Thursday, November 25, 2021

My Favorite Things About Being a Writer

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! First off, I'd like to say Happy Thanksgiving to my readers in the USA!! 


Today I'm going to be talking about my favorite things about being a writer. I'm also going to be talking about a few of my least favorite things about being a writer.


I have been a writer for about 4-5 years now, so I have found many things I love about it. 


Let's get into the post!

King, Alexandria. Musings of an Arthritic Artist. 2021.

Technically, there is nothing I dislike about being a writer. I love the process, and I actually find writing easier than drawing, for multiple reasons. However, that isn't what this post is about, so I won't be going into that. Despite the fact that I love everything about writing, I do have a list of favorites. So, let's get into my list.

1. Creating Characters

My favorite thing about writing is definitely creating characters. This seems simple, however this process takes me the longest. It has a lot of steps including, finding a character name that I feel fits, creating a character profile, creating a backstory, making character playlists, creating Pinterest boards based on their appearance and personality. 

There's a lot that goes into creating a character, especially when I'm the one creating one, but I love this process and I love creating new characters. I find it really fun and refreshing. It's never boring and it seems time-consuming, but I find it really enjoyable. 

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

Rant Review: Everything, Everything by Nicola Yoon (spoiler filled review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I am going to be doing another book review, this one a spoiler review of Everything, Everything by Nicola Yoon. 


This is a book I read pretty recently, so let's discuss it. There will be spoilers for this book. If you haven't read it and wish to, I'd recommend not reading this review. This review will spoil a lot.


With that aside, let's get into the review!

This story is about Madeline Whittier, an 18-year-old biracial (half-African American, half-Japanese) girl who lives inside a sterilized home because she has a rare disease called Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, or SCID for short. It is also known as 'bubble boy disease' after the media used it to refer to David Vetter, a young boy who was diagnosed with the condition in the 1970s.

Maddy has lived a pretty happy life. She spends a lot of time with her mother and her nurse, Carla. Then, Maddy's life changes drastically once Olly, a new boy next door moves in. They begin to talk through emails and get to know each other. 

This book is a romance story about a girl falling in love with the boy next door. 

________________________________________

I'm going to start this off by saying that I feel as if I am 85% qualified to discuss this book. 25% because I am 18 and have lived inside for most of my life, 25% because I've lived with a chronic illness for 18 years and have also been disabled for 10, 25% because I have had to take precautions regarding my chronic illness/autoimmune disease since I was a child, and 10% because I have immune system issues. The main difference is that I have an immune system that overreacts, not underreacts. The 15% I'm not qualified for is SCID (Severe Combined Immunodeficiency), solely because I don't have it.

With that small paragraph aside, let's get into what I liked and disliked about this book.

________________________________________

I related to Maddy a few times, the most notable being in the first few chapters where Madeline spends her eighteenth birthday indoors with her mother, due to her being in 'lifelong quarantine.' Like Madeline, I spent my 18th birthday indoors with my family. I didn't do any out of the house festivities due to the pandemic we are currently in and the risks of me getting sick. I related to this. I also related to a sentence written in the chapter where Maddy puts on a swimsuit. This is what is written:
"As it stands, my only issue is that I would gladly trade this body for one that works properly."

I don't know how many times I've thought this. Not recently, but last year and in past years where I was dealing with more autoimmune issues. On the other hand, the few sentences before talk about body-image issues that Madeline doesn't have, seemingly because she didn't grow up around people. I have a slight problem with this. How is Maddy so ignorant about the world around her? 

I know that her mother is overprotective, but she has a laptop, the internet, and also at the beginning of the novel talks about how she can't do 'normal teenager things,' like going to prom, getting a learner's permit, having a first kiss, having a first heartbreak, and having a first fender bender. She knows about how most 18-year-olds move out of the house and she knows about empty nest syndrome. I find it hard to believe that Maddy wouldn't ever have had body-image issues. 

I didn't grow up around anybody except my family. I saw children every now and again, but not often and I didn't typically speak to them. I wasn't around many people when I was little. I've been homeschooled since I was six. Like Maddy, I didn't grow up having any friends except those who were my immediate family. Like Maddy, I was taught at home, though I don't, and have never, done online school. Like Maddy, I have the internet.

A lot of times girls feel self-conscious about their bodies after hormonal changes. Sometimes I feel self-conscious even when I'm around my family. I don't like how I look with braids, especially singular ones. I find it hard to believe that Maddy didn't seem to know about the body stereotypes of America. If she knew about them, they just didn't affect her. I don't understand this. I don't understand how she just seemed 100% okay with her appearance for her entire life.

Also, did Maddy never look up SCID on the internet? She wouldn't have to look it up because she didn't trust her mother either. She could just look it up because she's curious. I don't know how many times I've looked up JIA and autoimmune disease because I wanted to learn more about it. Maddy reads a lot, as she stated in the very first sentence. She obviously likes learning information. 

If she looked up SCID I'm sure she would've found out sooner that she wasn't actually sick. Children with SCID are usually treated with a stem cell transplant within their first two years because their chances of survival are low. Without this transplant, most children die. A lot of children with SCID also take longer for their bodies to develop and a lot of them have difficulties gaining weight. I found all this out with less than half an hour's worth of research.

No one's reaction except for Olly's were realistic, and even then he was somewhat inconsistent during some parts.

________________________________________

Let's discuss that plot twist toward the end of the book. I knew about this twist going into it, but I held in all judgment because I don't usually judge books without reading them first. So I read this book and was just as disappointed and annoyed as I thought I would be. 

Here's the plot twist: Maddy was never sick. Instead, her mother is mentally ill. She never recovered after the deaths of Maddy's brother and father, so her mind deluded her, making her believe that her daughter had SCID. She was afraid of losing her daughter. 

So, in all actuality, this book is about child abuse. It's not about a girl with a severe chronic illness. It's not about a girl with a disability. It's a story about a healthy, non-disabled girl who has grown up sheltered and with an overprotective mom. That's it.

It's fine if someone wants to write a book about child abuse. In fact, that's something I'm currently covering in a YA fantasy novel I'm writing. The main story here is that Maddy's mom has Munchausen's Syndrome by proxy. I would've had no problem with this if it was handled properly. I will include links to what Munchausen's Syndrome by proxy is at the end of this post. I could explain it, but I feel like I won't do a well enough job of it.

Supposedly, Nicola Yoon was inspired to write this book after the birth of her biracial daughter, Laura. Being a first-time mom, she had been overprotective of her daughter and wanted to protect her from danger. So, essentially, this story was about the mom. It was partially about the daughter, but the plot twist is really about the mom, not Maddy.

I feel like this book could've been pulled off. If the story of an overprotective mother is what Nicola Yoon was inspired to write, then this book would've been suited better as a 3rd-person adult fiction novel from the perspective of the mother, not Maddy. 

Either that or Maddy could've found out that she wasn't sick a lot sooner (without a love interest making her risk everything) and tried to convince her mother that she is healthy.

________________________________________

It may seem like I'm overreacting about this. I will explain why I am not. This book, while having an adorable romance, is problematic when it comes to the topic of chronic illness and disability. Maddy lives a perfect life and seemingly has little to no mental health issues, which is great, though she never seems to struggle, which feels unrealistic. Chances are someone will have mental health struggles, particularly if they have a chronic illness. She lives her life and always finds something new to do. She seems happy, and she's never bored.

Then, once Olly moves in, she suddenly changes. After her trip to Hawaii with Olly, she shuts him out of her life as if he never existed because she can't envision a life where she has SCID and can be with Olly. She starts talking about how she hasn't actually been living. I have a problem with this on so many levels. It'd be one thing if Olly told Maddy that he couldn't be with a girl who was sick, but he doesn't. 

Problem #1: Just because you've lived the majority of your life inside, doesn't mean you aren't living. I got out of the house plenty of times as a kid, however, because I was homeschooled at a certain point, I was inside my house more than most children. Just because you've never experienced romantic love or gone outside, doesn't mean you aren't living. My life, despite me spending 75% of it inside my own house, has been incredible, and I wouldn't change it.

She shuts out the guy who saved her life in Hawaii. She shuts out the guy who still continues to send her emails and messages, basically showing that he wants to be with her whether she's sick or not. He loves her, and her having SCID won't stop him. But it stops Maddy.

Also, I cannot count how many times Maddy was reckless once she and Olly went to Hawaii. For one, the girl decides to leave her house and go to Hawaii even though she might die. She's willing to die for one chance at freedom. Why? Does she not realize that if she dies, Olly will be heartbroken? He numerously tells her to not die, and she just goes and puts her life at risk so she can feel the ocean. This isn't romantic, and this isn't inspiring. It's just...sad, insulting, and reckless. 

The girl could literally die if exposed to outside air and yet she steps outside with nary a thought. I know that anything could literally kill her. I get that, but the least she could do is wear a medical mask. It's never mentioned that there are face masks in her house, but her mother is a doctor. You'd assume she has some. 

Sure, the face mask might kill her because it's made of a foreign material that she's potentially allergic to, but the air could kill her as well. Then, while in Hawaii, she eats a bunch of food at a restaurant, gets into the ocean, and does a bunch of other realistic things. Never mind that she 'has allergies.'

The girl isn't the least bit nervous. How is it that she's so calm and collected while she's outside near things that could kill her? She should at least be more cautious and apprehensive. I had not been out in public for over 400 days, which is just over a year. I went out of town this June for a business trip. I was incredibly anxious. I was very cautious. I wore a mask, had hand sanitizers, plus numerous other things, and I was still anxious. 

I'm not considered high-risk by most people, but I still have autoimmune disease. My body could react horribly if I got COVID-19, so I took precautions. I still do. And honestly, it's insulting that Maddy could go out and be so reckless, especially when she still thinks she has SCID. If this was after she found out, that'd be one thing, but she assumed she still had SCID. This is problematic on so many levels. SCID is a more severe disease than JIA, and the fact that I am more cautious than this girl is saddening, reckless, and a downright insult.

Then, the plot twist. The core part of the story was about a girl who loved a boy but the main thing keeping the two of them apart was the fact that Maddy had SCID and couldn't go outside or be around people who weren't decontaminated. 

Once SCID is taken away, it's a normal YA romance book, with a normal non-disabled protagonist. That's all it is. This book was masqueraded around as a sick-lit novel. It was supposed to be in the same vein as The Fault in Our Stars, Midnight Sun (not the book by Stephenie Meyer), and Five Feet Apart (which was a movie first). But what those books have, this book lacks. 

Those books are about main characters who have real life-threatening conditions. The Fault in Our Stars is a book with two teenagers who have cancer that fall in love. Midnight Sun is about a girl with Xeroderma Pigmentosum and can't go out in the sun because of it who also falls in love. Five Feet Apart is about two teens who have cystic fibrosis who meet in the same hospital and fall in love, even though they have to stay six feet apart from each other or risk getting sick. 

Everything, Everything is a story where a girl is thought to have SCID, but who really has nothing and finds out her mother was mentally ill and lying to her for fifteen years. Everything, Everything is about unintentional child abuse, not a chronic illness. It's not a sick-lit book, nor should it ever be considered one. It's labeled under disability rep books. It shouldn't be. 

________________________________________

I would tag this under 'disability' and 'chronic illness,' but because of the revelation at the end of this book, I don't feel comfortable doing that. I'm not sure how I feel about this book. It's so conflicting.

I rate the first half of this book 4 out of the 5 stars. I rate the second half 1 out of 5 stars. This averages to a 2.5 star rating, so that's what my rating is. 

If you are looking for a romance novel, I'd recommend it. If you're looking for a book with disability rep or a book with a chronically ill protagonist, I wouldn't read it, because if you're like me, you'll be severely disappointed.

That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


See you Thursday, 


Lexi K🖌


Thursday, November 18, 2021

TV Review: Fate-The Winx Saga Season One (spoiler filled review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I'm going to be doing a TV show review. This is the second one of these that I have done on my blog.


I'm reviewing Fate: The Winx Saga, the Netflix live-action remake of Winx Club, an animated TV show that came out in 2004. If you haven't watched this show and wish to, I'd highly recommend not reading this. It will be full of spoilers. 


Let's get into the review!


First, let's discuss plot. What is this show exactly about? This show starts with Bloom Peters, a 16-year-old fairy who arrives at Alfea, a school for fairies. Alfea is located in the Otherworld, though Bloom previously lived in the First World (Earth) with her parents. I'll go more in depth with what the plot entails and what I did and didn't like about it, but this is the general premise.
________________________________________

This show took a lot of creative liberties, many that I'm not a fan of. I'm not saying that remakes and adaptations can't take creative liberties. They can, and most times, it'll leave room for a story that feels the same while also adding new elements. What I am saying is the creative liberty taken should at least make sense. 

There was a lot of liberty taken with Musa's character in particular. The animated Musa was upbeat and spoke her mind. This Musa is more reserved, quiet, and is mostly in her own world. With the changes they made in her abilities, this makes sense. I can understand why Netflix wouldn't necessarily want to make Musa the Fairy of Music like she is in the cartoon, especially since this is geared toward an older audience. Making a fairy of music may seem childish and juvenile, even if you can make her use sound waves as her power. 

Instead she is a mind fairy and can easily interpret emotions, both from other people and nature. She can also manipulate pain through emotion. She is frequently seen with headphones and is always listening to music as a way to block out the emotions she can always feel due to her being an empath.

This liberty makes sense. Other liberties taken, such as with Bloom's character, Aisha's character, and the introduction of Terra, make no sense. I'll begin with the changes of Aisha and Terra before finishing with Bloom, who I liked the least out of all the characters surprisingly, who was actually one of my favorite characters in the original show.


This is the DVD cover of the second season of Winx Club. The only reason I didn't show the cover for season 1 is because Aisha/Layla wasn't introduced until season 2 of the animated show. Notice how there are six fairies. In this show, there are only five, though only four of the fairies from season 2 of the original Winx because Terra is a new character. In the first season of this show, Flora is nonexistent, as is Tecna.
________________________________________

Let's talk about Aisha. In the original Winx, Layla/Aisha was a princess, while in this version, she is not. She's also more uptight in this remake. I understand how someone would want to follow the rules, but Aisha bordered on annoying because of how uptight she was. To be honest, Aisha didn't really do much. She was just there to provide information, tell on Bloom, and be Bloom's best friend. Quite frankly, I barely remember what she did besides the things I just mentioned.

Now we'll discuss the changes regarding Terra. Initially I thought that Terra was supposed to be Flora, and I was honestly quite upset about this. I loved Flora in the original show, and I'd say that she was my second favorite after Bloom. It was later said that Terra is Flora's cousin and that Paulina Chavez was cast in the role of Flora for season 2, which I actually am excited about because I really want to see Flora. 
________________________________________

Let's get to Bloom. Where to begin? Her backstory is changed from the original, particularly her parents. In the original show, her parents knew she was special. She was found by her adopted father in a fire where the flames never touched her. In this version, she was switched out soon after her adopted parents' daughter died due to a heart defect. They believe Bloom is their biological daughter and don't know she's different. This isn't a change I was the biggest fan of.

Another thing, moreso involving Bloom's character. One scene stuck out to me in particular and it really annoyed me. In this remake, Bloom has a strained relationship with her mother. She tells Aisha in the first episode that she got angry and nearly burned down the house. Her mother ended up with third-degree burns. I hate this so much. For one, in the original cartoon, Bloom's relationship with her parents is so perfect and caring. In this show, they made the mother be completely unfair to her by taking off the door to her room because she slammed it.

However, this whole thing started because of Bloom and also how the writers made the mom. She argues with her mom before this. Her mother has unfair expectations of her and wants her to do things she doesn't want to. Bloom tells her mom that she doesn't want to be a basic b*tch like she is. Yeah, that's how far Bloom and her mother's argument goes. I was watching the show, and I was so frustrated. 

One of the best parts of the original show is the relationship Bloom has with her parents. I know that teenagers tend to naturally drift apart from their parents a bit when they hit a certain age because they want to be more independent, but this entire show is pretty much endless drama and angst when it comes to the parents of the fairies. 

Bloom and her parents don't get along, Stella and her mom don't get along, which is contrary to Stella's mother in the original Winx. I can't think of a single good mother figure. The original was great about having good parental figures. Not all were good, but most of them were. 

In this version, Bloom's mother is obstinate and can't seem to reconcile with the fact that her daughter can't be perfect, Stella's mother is controlling toward her and is a recurring antagonist in this series, and Musa's mother--who seems to be the only mother who was potentially good--is dead, which is (for once) true to the original source material, only in the original Musa's mother died when she was a child. 
________________________________________

The nice thing about the original Winx was that while it was juvenile, girly, and cheesy at times, it was timeless. It didn't date itself with references. Bloom was raised in Gardenia, California, but while she was from Earth, it didn't specify what period of time this Earth was. Alfea was a boarding school in Magix. Magix was a planet. 

One of the most annoying things about Fate: The Winx Saga is that it tries too hard to be 'cool' and 'teen.' I'm assuming that the target audience is people who grew up watching the original show, especially because of the TV-MA rating. It's clearly intended for older teens who probably watched this show and are around mine and my sister's ages (18-27), the youngest likely being 15-17 years old. 

This show is laden with references that age it. Some of the things are also so cliche it's not even funny. I hate the trope where every single boarding school has to somehow exist in the United Kingdom. It's never outright said where the school is located, but literally everyone around Bloom has a British accent. 

It's as if the behind the scenes crew wanted to recreate Hogwarts. There's even a scene in the first episode where Bloom meets Aisha and they discuss Harry Potter and sort each other into houses. These references date the show, which wouldn't be a bad thing minus the fact that the original Winx Club didn't do this. 

I don't have a problem with the United Kingdom, nor British actors, but it just feels weird that the only person who doesn't have a British accent is Bloom, who is from Gardenia, California. It's as if the writers wanted to use the 'American girl in British boarding school' trope, but with a magical school located who knows where (Magix in the original show).
________________________________________

As for other changes that were made, Faragonda has changed into a new character named Farah Dowling, who is the headmistress of Alfea and isn't nearly as knowledgeable as Faragonda. There are also essentially no witches. In the original show, witches were similar to fairies, but were typically their magical opposites. In this show, the only witches mentioned are the Blood Witches, who were humans who drew on sacrifice and death to perform magic.

Additionally, the main teenage antagonist is Beatrix, an air fairy who was originally born in Aster Fell, a village of witches that Rosalind (another main antagonist) destroyed. I'm assuming that she's meant to be inspired by the Trix in the original show. Icy, Darcy, and Stormy, don't exist and instead seem to be inspirations for Beatrix. Beatrix has lightning powers, like Stormy. Riven is also Beatrix's love interest, which is similar to how Darcy had a relationship with Riven in season one of Winx Club. She's also pretty ruthless like Icy.

As of right now, it's unclear whether Beatrix is a fairy or witch due to her being born in Aster Dell. She was raised as a fairy, however I have a feeling that it's going to be revealed that Beatrix is actually a witch in the next season. If she's not a witch, I'm honestly going to be annoyed.

Instead of the Specialists all being male and the Fairies all being female in the original show, Specialists are male and female as are fairies. This is one of the few changes I had no problem with and actually welcomed warmly. 
________________________________________

Overall, I didn't really enjoy Fate: The Winx Saga much. The first season at least. I was not a fan of it. Some of it was interesting, but most was not. I rate this show 3 out of 5 stars. The only reason why it's a 3 and not a 2 is because I genuinely liked Musa and ship her and Sam. I do intend to watch season 2 when it's released, and I'm excited to see what they do with Flora. I also want them to go into the whole Daphne plot, as that was a key component of the original series.

That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


Until next time, 


Lexi K🖌

Tuesday, November 16, 2021

Book Review: The Last of August by Brittany Cavallaro (spoiler filled review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I am going to be doing another book review, this one a spoiler review of The Last of August by Brittany Cavallaro, the second book in the Charlotte Holmes series. 


This is a book I read pretty recently, so let's discuss out. There will be spoilers for both A Study in Charlotte and The Last of August, so if you haven't read either of those books and wish to, I'd recommend not reading this review.


With that aside, let's get into the review!



The Last of August was a very interesting book. This book follows Charlotte Holmes and her partner, Jamie Watson, as they try to locate Charlotte's uncle, Leander, who has gone missing. This book doesn't take place that much after the events in A Study in Charlotte.
___________________________________________________

There were a few things I found predictable in this story. Particularly involving the title. August Moriarty is revealed to be alive at the end of the previous installment. I read the title and two possibilities came to me: either August dies or he disappears off the face of the earth. Midway through the novel, it is hinted that the title came from The Last of August, a seemingly made up painting for this book to potentially 'explain' the title. If so, I wasn't completely fooled. 

August is shot down by Milo, Charlotte's older brother, on the very last page of the novel. I predicted this from a mile away. However, his 'death' was so sudden that it didn't felt genuine and felt very rushed. I feel like Milo would've been more upset than he was about shooting August. After all, Charlotte cares about August and Milo, to some level, cares about Charlotte. So why he acted so heartless and nonchalant about it doesn't make sense? Jamie's reaction felt genuine. Charlotte's felt mostly genuinely. But again, his death was so sudden that it didn't make sense. 

Because it felt so sudden and ingenuine, I don't believe August is dead. I think he and Milo faked his death again. I don't know what makes me believe this, but it makes sense as to why Milo would seem as if he didn't care. He also left Charlotte alone to deal with everything, which seems very heartless, even for Milo. I know that Jamie wrote that there was a 'dark halo' around August's head, which I assume is supposed to be blood, however, everyone knows that you should check someone's pulse and breaths before concluding anything. 

Another thing that doesn't make sense to me was how August pointed out that Charlotte and her family were trying to frame Phillipa and Hadrian Moriarty, August's older siblings, for Leander's disappearance as well as the poisoning of Mrs. Holmes. This doesn't make sense to me. 

I mean, maybe I missed something in the plot, but from I could gather, Hadrian and Phillipa helped to kidnap Jamie and Charlotte. They also forged paintings and sold them, which is illegal. August was in contact with his siblings to some degree, and none of them bothered to tell him that they didn't have Leander? None of that makes sense. Maybe Hadrian and Phillipa didn't kidnap Leander, maybe they didn't poison Charlotte's mother, but they were still criminals. Selling art forgeries is illegal as is kidnapping. Unless I missed a key part of the plot, what is August missing here? 
___________________________________________________

As for the characters, Jamie annoyed me a little. His impatience with Charlotte got on my nerves. However, Charlotte sometimes didn't help the situation. Most of it is on Jamie, but Charlotte shares about 2% of the blame. 

Charlotte, on the other hand, didn't feel much different from the first book. She still acted the same way. There was nothing about her that got better or worse. My only question is, how much of Mrs. Holmes's poisoning did she know about and did she actually know where Leander was the entire time? Was the entire case just a ruse? It is implied, but it's never actually said, so I was very confused about that.

I found August very fascinating and wanted to read more about him. He was given more of a personality in this book since this was his first, official introduction. I'm glad we actually got to get to know him.

___________________________________________________

Overall, I give The Last of August 4.5 stars out of 5. I liked the first book more. This one was enjoyable, but Jamie annoyed me a little more. Thankfully, August made up for it a bit. I'm excited to read the rest of the series, and I am excited to see what The Case For Jamie has in store.


That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


See you Thursday, 


Lexi K🖌

Thursday, November 11, 2021

Book Review: Witch & Wizard by James Patterson (spoiler free review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I'm going to be doing a book review. This review is for Witch & Wizard by James Patterson and Gabrielle Charbonnet.


I read this book last year during quarantine because it was quick, had siblings, and was a YA fantasy.


Let's get into the review!


Normally I would give a plot description of my own, but because I'm having a hard time describing this book, I will include the synopsis, which reads as follows:
The world is changing—the government has seized control of every aspect of society, and now kids are disappearing. For fifteen-year-old Wisty and her older brother Whit, life turns upside-down when they are hauled out of bed one night, separated from their parents, and thrown into a secret compound for no reason they can comprehend. The new government is clearly trying to suppress Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Being a Normal Teenager.

Imprisoned together and condemned to death, Wisty and Whit begin exhibiting strange abilities and powers they never dreamed of. Maybe there is a reason they were singled out. Can this newly discovered witch and wizard master their skills in time to save themselves, their parents—and maybe the world?

I'm sure you can kind of see why this book is so hard for me to describe. There's a lot going on, and overall, it seems like it's meant to be a comical book. 

________________________________________

This book has many cliches in it, but it seems as if this is intentional. Some of the terms are even cliche and comical, such as The One Who is the One being the name of the main villain and The Order referring to the government and all that. These are cliche cheesy fantasy names, but this seems intentional, which is fascinating to me.

This story doesn't take itself too seriously. It's humorous and honestly reads like a B-rate fantasy film. However, it's enjoyable, and as long as the story isn't taken seriously, it's an enjoyable read. It's not going to be a classic, it's not even a book that makes you think. 

I don't know if it's intended, but it kind of reads like a spoof (though it seems like it is intentional). Again, it's not serious. It's very lighthearted and mindless. The ideas are outlandish but fun. I'd say it falls under something like goofy fantasy, which would be a book that has elements of fantasy but is so humorous and wacky that it seems like a joke.

________________________________________ 

One of my favorite parts about this book was the relationship between Whit and Wisty. The two were such a realistic sibling pair. They disagreed, but at the end of the day, they looked out for each other. They teased each other, but they worked together when they needed to, and I'm really excited to read more about them in the future. Hopefully the end of this series doesn't leave me disappointed.

________________________________________

This book wasn't fantastic, but it made for a fun time. I rated this book 4 out of 5 on my Goodreads. Is this a serious book? Not really. But is it fun? Yes. 


That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


Until next time, 


Lexi K🖌

Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Book Review: Confessions of a Murder Suspect by James Patterson (spoiler free review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I'm going to be doing a book review. This review is for Confessions of a Murder Suspect by James Patterson and Maxine Paetro.


I read this book during the beginning of quarantine last year.


Let's get into the review!

This book follows a teen girl named Tandy Angel, who is a suspect in the death of her parents, Malcolm and Maud Angel. Tandy is a suspect along with her three siblings in their parents' mysterious deaths as Tandy was the last person who saw them alive.

The writing for this novel was very interesting. Tandy was the very definition of an unreliable narrator. Typically, it's very easy to trust a main character, especially in mystery novels, however--with how this book is written--it is downright impossible to get a read on the protagonist. It's a difficult book to predict because of this.
________________________________________

The plot itself was very intriguing, and the novel itself isn't very long despite being 372 pages long. The chapters are so short that it's a breeze to get through even though it's an average length book. It's very easy to read a few chapters when you have the time, and it's a very easy novel to binge-read. I was able to start and finish it in one day, which I found incredibly nice.

The plot in of itself is pretty simplistic and straightforward. There's nothing incredibly intricate about it, however the alibis and backstories that the characters had made me very curious about who the culprit in this murder mystery was. 
________________________________________

There was at least one cliche that got on my nerves that occurs in many YA mystery novels, and that is the 'oblivious/stupid' detective that the protagonist runs circles around despite the detective doing their job longer and having more experience. That was the main thing that annoyed me.

One of my favorite things about this novel was the sibling dynamics. As I've mentioned in numerous posts, I love reading books with siblings in them. They make the stories more interesting, fun, and more relatable (at least for me since I have a sibling of my own). This book fit what I wanted at the time. I wanted a mystery novel, but I also wanted a book with siblings, and this book fit the mold almost too perfectly.
________________________________________

Confessions of a Murder Suspect wasn't my favorite book, nor was it the best book I've ever read, however, it was incredibly enjoyable and quick. Despite it being a mystery novel, it didn't make me think too much, which was nice since I wanted to read something lighthearted and fun during the beginning of quarantine. This book successfully got me out of reality/the real world and into a murder mystery that was quick. 

Overall, I rate this book 4 out of 5 stars. It wasn't the best mystery novel, and the writing wasn't anything special either, but it made for an enjoyable day.

That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


See you Thursday, 


Lexi K🖌

Thursday, November 4, 2021

Book Review: Throne of Glass by Sarah J. Maas (spoiler free review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I'm going to be doing a book review. This review is for Throne of Glass by Sarah J. Maas.


I read this book last year. There will be spoilers for this book, so if you haven't read this book and wish to, I wouldn't recommend reading this review.


Let's get into the review!

Throne of Glass follows Celaena Sardothien, an 18-year-old assassin. At the beginning of the novel, she is imprisoned and held in a slave camp called Endovier. Prince Dorian, the Crown Prince of Adarlan, offers Celaena a chance to compete with other assassins and thieves. The prize is a chance to serve as the King’s Champion, and eventually won her freedom after serving the king for four years.

The plot itself is very intriguing. As for the writing, it fell flat for me. This novel is told in third-person perspective, which is fine. I have no problem with third-person perspective.

It’s just that this novel has varying perspectives. We follow Celaena, Dorian, and Chaol, the Captain of the Guard. Sometimes the POV changes mid-chapter. It can get confusing and annoying. 

The writing isn’t fantastic, but it isn’t horrible either. It’s just kind of in between. It just seemed mediocre to me. If I’m not mistaken, this was Sarah J. Maas’s debut novel. If so, it definitely reads as such. Hopefully these books get better. I didn’t hate this book. It just wasn’t my favorite.

________________________________________

One thing I really liked about Throne of Glass was that Celaena used weapons while also embracing her femininity. She did get on my nerves a few times, but overall she was fine. She wasn’t a great character, but she wasn’t awful either. I found her to be boring sometimes but that might’ve just been the writing. I’m not completely sure.

The characters are interesting, but I didn’t connect to any of them. I think that’s why this isn’t one of my favorite books. I’m a character-driven person, so if the characters aren’t compelling enough or I can’t connect with them, then the story isn’t as enjoyable to me. 
________________________________________

Overall, this novel was enjoyable. It was easy to get through and didn’t require me to think too much. Despite how hard the writing was to get through sometimes, I did genuinely enjoy the story. It was simplistic and the plot was easy to follow. I gave this novel 4 out of 5 stars.

That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


Until next time, 


Lexi K🖌

Tuesday, November 2, 2021

Book Review: The Invention of Hugo Cabret by Brian Selznick (spoiler free review)

Welcome back to Musings of an Arthritic Artist! Today I'm going to be doing a book review. This review is for The Invention of Hugo Cabret by Brian Selznick.


I originally read this book about 8 years ago, but decided to reread it this year because I love this book.


Let's get into the review!


I first mentioned this book in this post: Book Spotlight: My Top 10 Illustrated Books (opens in new window). This book was on that list. I did a brief review in that post, but I feel like this book is so good that it deserves a review post all to itself.
________________________________________

This book is about 12-year-old Hugo Cabret, an orphan who lives in a train station in Paris in the 1930s. This is a historical fiction novel. It has a lot of historical elements sprinkled in (as it should), and gives a good introductory insight into the history of film and cinema.

This is a novel told in words and pictures. It's very unique and is the first children's novel/chapter book to receive the Caldecott Medal, an award given annually to the preceding year's "most distinguished American picture book for children." The Caldecott and Newbery medals are considered the most prestigious awards for American children's books. 

This book is 537 pages long, which is actually quite long for a children's/middle grade, however, in all actuality, the book is actually about 300 pages because 284 pages is just pure pencil drawings or photographs.
________________________________________

This book (and the movie) caused me and my mother to spiral into a rabbit hole of film history. Both the book and movie reference original films, such as The Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat Station (viewable on YouTube; film was released in 1895), which was one of the original films created. It was a 50 second silent film that was made by the Lumière Brothers, who were thought of to have the first public screening in film history. The train arrives at the station and ends up out of frame, which caused the audience then to get startled because they thought the train was really coming toward them!

Both the movie and book reference Georges Méliès (who is crucial to the plot), a French film director known for special effects and films such as A Trip to the Moon (1902; also available on YouTube; loosely based on From the Earth to the Moon by Jules Verne), which is regarded as one of the most influential films in cinema, and The Impossible Voyage (1904). He made over 500 films, but only about 200 have survived through war and other trauma.

There are other references, such as a reference to The Clock Store, which was a Silly Symphony short released by Walt Disney Studios in 1931 and Safety Last! from 1923.

Personally, I'm not a big fan of black and white movies (because of two reasons: I've always loved color and two, I nearly went completely colorblind because of a medication I was taking [long story; maybe I'll discuss it in the future]), however, I enjoyed watching The Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat Station and A Trip to the Moon with my mother, and have since watched both a few times. Around the time that I watched the movie and read the book, I actually drew a picture of a scene in A Trip to the Moon (the scene where their ship [a capsule shaped like a bullet] crashes into the Man in the Moon's eye).

The Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat (Lumiere Brothers, 1895)

A Trip to the Moon (Georges Melies, 1902)

________________________________________

Overall, this is one of my favorite books ever. It's a combination of picture book and chapter book, so it's the kind of book that's right up my alley. I'd recommend it to anyone who loves children's books and film history. I'd also recommend it to people who like novelty. It's also a great way to introduce children to chapter books while still having a lot of illustrations.

I rate The Invention of Hugo Cabret 5 out of 5 stars. It's a fantastic book, and I love it.

That's it for this review! I hope you enjoyed it! 


See you Thursday, 


Lexi K🖌